2014 Australian Grand Prix Countdown
Quote:From the horses mouth, a review on the FW33 from Sam Michael.
The team took a bold direction with the FW33 but it didn't work out.
"As soon as double diffusers were banned," Michael explains, "we looked and said, right, the fastest single diffuser car in '09 was the Red Bull RB5 and Adrian Newey designed it with a very low gearbox and driveshafts. We went a whole step lower and embarked on it early because we had to do a lot to make the driveshafts survive.
"Making the gearbox small was quite straightforward. People said we'd lose all the stiffness but it was no less stiff than a normal 'box.
"By dropping the gearbox height the airflow to the rear lower wing is better. When we got rid of the double diffuser and looked at the rear lower wing for 2011, it had increased downforce three-fold. It became clear you had to make it work. The whole concept was about that."
The team used Toyota's electric dyno in Cologne, and after some early test failures, had no problems, the only issue being a failure when Barrichello got stones in a driveshaft boot in Australia and the joint dried out. And, despite the extreme solution, Michael estimates that power loss was less than 0.5 bhp.
Having moved heaven and earth to get better flow to the lower rear wing, something spoiled it which Williams could do nothing about.
"The engine restricted us taking full advantage," Michael explained. "It's homologated and you cannot change it. That's why the cover was shrink-wrapped around it. It looked pretty ugly but you can't change that - that's as small as we could make it. The Renault is different in that the back of its trumpet tray funnels very heavily. It wasn't like that on the Cosworth."
In light of that, Michael concedes that "We probably spent too much energy for the company's resources making the gearbox work. Going from a high pushrod gearbox to a pullrod consumed a lot of the design office. It created quite a bit of conflict.
"It took a lot of energy away from areas like the exhaust. We didn't do a top job on the blown exhausts even though our 2010 blown diffuser worked pretty well. We took our eye off the ball with that. In terms of running the exhausts down where Red Bull were, we didn't think of that, so we spent most of the year catching up on blown diffusers."
Williams first tried a Red Bull type-system at the Chinese GP but burning was problematic and it was not until almost halfway through the year that progress was made.
The team did not have hot-blowing either and it's perhaps not surprising that Williams looked its best at Silverstone, when Maldonado qualified seventh. That was the race where everyone else's hot blowing was restricted and Williams debuted a new blown diffuser.
Michael says that the team's KERS was also quite heavy, over 30kgs, and that the harvesting and brake balance needed to be better. It was done to a tight budget with Cosworth control systems.
How It All Went Wrong According to Sam
Unfortunately, the poster didn't provide a link. We still don't know any more about the floor breaking issue.
Quote:"I was pleased with Pastor," Michael says. "I think he's really good. He ran Rubens pretty close all year and I rate Rubens. I think he'll be better again in his second year after learning all the tracks. He definitely deserves his place in F1. His first four or five races were pretty rough, but that's what you get with a rookie."
Quote:Mike coughlan said that some strategic errors were made wrong in the past.Re-wsg he said that it was a gample between vehicle dynamics performance and aerodynamics,the cost from the first would be outweighed by the second and we all know the outcome.Its on the cristmas ignition.K1
if that report is correct it somehow proves the point re development of the WSG. the cosworth design profile was a known quantity and failure to reconcile that factor with the required aero demands seems to be a fundamental error that should not have been made.
surely the wind tunnel would have thrown up some serious deviations? i suppose that timing would have been a critical factor insofar as the WSG had quite a long gestation but i find it all rather amateurish.
it also appears to confirm that there was some disssatisfaction on the allocation of funds to try and rectify this anomaly. maybe the poster who came on board last year to highlight the discord internally was in fact dead right.
i guess the question is, will williams continue on with the WSG as part of this years car? SM's comment re the trumpet tray seems to indicate that they will. interesting.