Username
Password
BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
By BMW Sauber F1
June 6 2009
Qualifying for the Turkish Grand Prix in Istanbul saw an obviously improved performance from the BMW Sauber F1 Team. Tenth and 11th on the grid for Robert Kubica and Nick Heidfeld is not a reason to celebrate, but nevertheless motivating as it is a move in the right direction.
Robert Kubica: "Starting from P10 is definitely better than starting from P18 the way I did in Monaco. However, we still lack a bit of pace compared to the top cars. The track clearly suits our car better than the Monaco track did. However, we really have to fight tomorrow. Although the gap to the lead cars is quite close, there are a lot of cars between us and the front row. It will be difficult."

Nick Heidfeld: "I have mixed feelings about today's qualifying. On one hand it is annoying to miss the top ten qualifying by such a margin, but on the other I'm happy to see the progress we've made. The car was quick enough for Q3. I was seventh overall before my final outing in Q2 but then I was stuck in traffic on the last sector of my out lap. Given how the 2009 tyres are, this is enough to prevent them from heating up properly and consequently ruin your flying lap. Our new aero package with the double diffuser is obviously a step forward. This is not only compared to Monaco, but also to Barcelona where I scored two points after starting 13th on the grid."

Mario Theissen (BMW Motorsport Director): "We produced a solid performance in today's qualifying. Obviously, our goal was, to get both cars into Q3, which didn't quite work out. Today, once again, the whole field was very close. Nick missed Q3 by just five hundreds of a second, and Robert was finally tenth. What this means in terms of the race we will only see once we know the competitors' strategy. On the positive side, in Q2, when all the drivers were running in the same conditions, the gap to the front runners was only just 0.4 of a second. This proves the new aero package has had a positive effect."

Willy Rampf (Head of Engineering): "Today's result confirms we have made a step in the right direction. However, if we want to fight for the top positions we have to bring updates of the same magnitude to the next races. Yesterday we were able to find a basic set-up for the new aero package, which was also important for the ongoing development of the car. For Robert and Nick it will not be easy to score points tomorrow."

View a Printer Friendly version of this Story.

Bookmark or share this story with:

6 Jun, 2009 14:32 Report
BMW Sauber F1 (IP Logged)
Unregistered User
BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

ReplyQuote
6 Jun, 2009 18:06 Report
wingman1961 (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location:
Posts: 496
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
Mario Theissen (BMW Motorsport Director): "We produced a solid performance in today's qualifying.

HA, HA. No kidding. 10th and 11th is not what I would call solid performance. Was better than in Monaco, but still is not what we expected.

ReplyQuote
6 Jun, 2009 19:35 Report
nasalkid (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Sep, 2008
Location:
Posts: 44
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
being 0.4 s off the leading pace is not that bad,better understanding of how to set up thecar with the new aero plus few minor tweaks here and there and we will be back in business. not bad at all!

ReplyQuote
6 Jun, 2009 20:31 Report
soarq (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Jan, 2009
Location:
Posts: 280
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
0.4s it's like 1s year or 2 years ago...

ReplyQuote
6 Jun, 2009 22:13 Report
wingman1961 (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location:
Posts: 496
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
Quote:
nasalkid
being 0.4 s off the leading pace is not that bad,better understanding of how to set up thecar with the new aero plus few minor tweaks here and there and we will be back in business. not bad at all!

0.4 sec is OK, but that doesn't make them to score the points.
Only 1st place that what's counts. Any thing less second best.

ReplyQuote
6 Jun, 2009 23:41 Report
paul45 (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location:
Posts: 272
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
it's important not to forget this year is special
McLaren are back
ferrari just in front of BMW
But all of those teams are behind teams like brawn, red bull williams anfd toyota

adding that gap between teams are small (very), it makes this year very particular. All in all, it makes difficult any definite judgement

ReplyQuote
7 Jun, 2009 07:36 Report
popilirol a.k.a. rolren (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location:
Posts: 1374
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
I agree with nasalkid and paul45.

Let's do a quick comparison between Malaysian Q2, Bahrain Q2, Spanish Q2, Monaco Q2, and Turkish Q2 when all cars are in their most competitive form. I know these tracks differ in aerodynamic setups but still, we can draw some conclusions on how good the imrovements are.

I'm going to post only the fastest of Ferrari, McLaren Mercedes, Brawn Mercedes, RBR Renault, and us.

Malaysian Q2 - gap

J. Button, Brawn Mercedes - 1:33.784
......
M. Webber, RBR Renault - 1:34.222 - 0.438
......
K. Raikkonen, Ferrari - 1:34.456 - 0.672
......
R. Kubica, BMW Sauber F1 - 1:34.562 - 0.778
......
L. Hamilton, McLaren Mercedes - 1:34.905 - 1.121

Bahrain Q2 - gap

S. Vettel, RBR Renault - 1:32.474
......
J. Button, Brawn Mercedes - 1:32.842 - 0.368
......
F. massa, Ferrari - 1:32.827 - 0.353
......
L. Hamilton, McLaren Mercedes - 1:32.877 - 0.403
......
R. Kubica, BMW Sauber F1 - 1:33.487 - 1.013

Spanish Q2 - gap ***U***

R. Barrichello, Brawn Mercedes - 1:19.954
......
M. Webber, RBR Renault - 1:20.007 - 0.054
......
F. Massa, Ferrari - 1:20.149 - 0.195
......
R. kubica, BMW Sauber F1 - 1:20.408 - 0.454
......
L. Hamilton, McLaren Mercedes - 1:20.805 - 0.851

Monaco Q2 - gap

K. Raikkonen, Ferrari - 1:14.514
......
H. Kovalainen, McLaren Mercedes - 1:14.809 - 0.295
......
M. Webber, RBR Renault - 1:14.825 - 0.311
......
R. Barrichello - Brawn Mercedes - 1:14.829 - 0.315
......
R. Kubica, BMW Sauber F1 - disq.

Turkish Q2 - gap ***U***

S. Vettel, RBR Renault - 1:27.016
......
J. Button, Brawn Mercedes - 1:27.230 - 0.214
......
F. Massa, Ferrari - 1:27.349 - 0.333
......
R. Kubica, BMW Sauber F1 - 1:27.455 - 0.439
......
H. Kovalainen, McLaren Mercedes - disq.

So you can see that whenever we introduce a major update, the gap reduces back to 0.4--, which is a fruitful result. But what draws my attention even further more is the gap between us and Ferrari. That means in our first major update, the gap between us and Ferrari was 0.259 whereas in our second major update, the gap between us and Ferrari reduced to 0.106. That is more or less a good indication that if we continue with our development/update pace like that, we're going to overleap Ferrari. And that is what we might be able to achieve at most this season in my opinion.

P.S. ***U*** denotes the introduction of a major update on our cars.

BMW Power

ReplyQuote
7 Jun, 2009 07:47 Report
nasalkid (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Sep, 2008
Location:
Posts: 44
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
Yes it is in terms of grid positions but its still only 0.4 to make up and not 1 s. the most important thing is we found some answers and the direction we took finally seems good

ReplyQuote
7 Jun, 2009 07:49 Report
nasalkid (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Sep, 2008
Location:
Posts: 44
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
replying to soarq post

ReplyQuote
7 Jun, 2009 08:01 Report
Gemm (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location:
Posts: 2678
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
I am not denying we are closer. In fact if you would consider gao in % of laptime, not seconds, it would be even more indicative.

Istanbul track is longer than than Catalunya, so +0,4 in gao here is less behind than +0,4 gap there.

It's just that I expected we may bigger leaf towards front in comparison to our Barcelona pace.

Yeah, it looks great comparing to Bahrain or Monaco, but in those track we were some bad I would rather quickly discard them as any benchmarks.

Barcelona should be a benchmark, as this was the previous version of the car upgrade.

And on final note:

We are comparing single best Q2 laps. Nothing wrong with that. But let's remember the driving factor in it. A single little mistake or lack of it can easily swing the gap back or forth by 0,2 sec.

ReplyQuote
7 Jun, 2009 09:15 Report
soarq (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Jan, 2009
Location:
Posts: 280
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
Also have in mind BMW has probably worst mechanical grip on the grid. Aero is reasonable, but they need to fix mechanical side of the car - which means B spec of F1.09 is needed.

There were made great mistakes in design of the car, and some people have to kicked out of the team IMHO. Sorry it's Formula 1, if you're not good enough you're out!

ReplyQuote
7 Jun, 2009 10:39 Report
barteks (IP Logged)
BMWF1Talk Moderator
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3105
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
If I recall correctly, Kubica aborted his last flying lap in Q2. So he could be maybe even one tenth quicker.

2008 Prediction Champion

ReplyQuote
8 Jun, 2009 08:01 Report
popilirol a.k.a. rolren (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location:
Posts: 1374
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
I find it funny how some call it not enough. How much is enough relative to them? Did they expect to see our team jump from 9th team to 2nd? I find it ridiculous. In my eyes, jumping from 9th to 4th is more than enough.

BMW Power

ReplyQuote
8 Jun, 2009 08:31 Report
barteks (IP Logged)
BMWF1Talk Moderator
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3105
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
popilirol a.k.a. rolren, what was the jump between Barcelona and Istanbul races? eye rolling smiley

2008 Prediction Champion

ReplyQuote
9 Jun, 2009 04:23 Report
Gemm (IP Logged)
Registered User
Date Joined: Apr, 2007
Location:
Posts: 2678
Re: BMW's Turkey Quali Reactions: an improvement but not enough
Quote:
popilirol a.k.a. rolren
I find it funny how some call it not enough. How much is enough relative to them? Did they expect to see our team jump from 9th team to 2nd? I find it ridiculous. In my eyes, jumping from 9th to 4th is more than enough.

From 9th? You mean Monaco? The hole in which have fallen? What kinf of comparison basis is that? By this way of logic Toyota made quite of a jump, as they went from 10th to 3rd. LOL

And you saw us in 4th in Turkey? That's seriously pink glasses you are looking through. Who exactly we were quicker than: Toyota? Ferrari? Williams?

I see you are set for joyful season: all we have to do is swing between 9th and 5th and you will be jumping with joy every second race...

ReplyQuote
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListLog In

Your Name: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
CAPTCHA
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net