By Andrew Hooper
March 20 2003
|
|
|
| FIA Thursday Press Conference | |
|
DRIVERS: Rubens BARRICHELLO (FERRARI), Jenson BUTTON (BAR), Heinz-Harald
FRENTZEN (SAUBER), Juan Pablo MONTOYA (WILLIAMS), Jarno TRULLI (RENAULT) and
Jos VERSTAPPEN (MINARDI) Q: Jos, you’ve been away for a year, what’s changed in that time? Jos VERSTAPPEN: New cars, different tyres, not much has changed honestly. Q:
A lot to get used to? JV: Yeah, a bit of driving would help. I did the last race in Japan in 2001 and did my first race again two weeks ago, and between those two races, I didn’t do that much testing so it was very hard to do the race. Q: You have had physical problems in the past, did you find that in Melbourne? JV: No, not really. I finished the race and felt really good. I did a lot of training just before the race and obviously that helped quite a lot. Q: You’ve been in Formula One longer than most people in your team, how much can you bring to the team? JV: I know that I can. My first race was in 1994 so I’ve done 92 races so far, in and out of Formula One sometimes, and that makes it hard. I think it’s better to race every year and to develop with it. But to be out for a year, you have to learn, you have to learn on the tyre side, so there’s still a lot to learn, I think. Q: So you’re bringing quite a lot to the team? JV: You have to ask the engineers, but I think so. Q: Jenson, things have been fairly fraught with Jacques over the last couple of months, and didn’t seem to improve in Melbourne… Jenson BUTTON: Yeah, we get on fine. Yeah, lots of things obviously happened in Australia for whatever reason. That was Australia and it’s finished now. We’ve just got to get on with this race and hope that the same things don’t happen. Q: Could you have stayed out for another lap and delayed your pit stop? JB: No, no, I would have run out of fuel. Q: So what has been done to prevent the problem that you had in Melbourne? JB: Yeah, the radios are fixed now, they work now. Mine’s fine. After the race a lot of work has gone into making sure the radios are working well. Hopefully they will be good here. Q: Apart from Jacques, do you feel that you’ve settled in pretty well? JB: Yeah, very good, very very happy. The most comfortable I think I’ve been in Formula One, and probably the team that I’ve been most happy with. Everyone seems very positive and we’re all working together very very well. Q: What really makes the difference? JB: I think the biggest difference is when I came into the team; we got down to work very very quickly whereas other teams, they were a little bit unsure, with me being young and quite inexperienced. But here, we got on very quickly and we started working with the new car very very quickly and they also listened to what I had to say from the word go which is very important. Q: So I’m sure you feel that the result was not representative… JB: It was crap. No, but I think that’s the same for a lot of teams. The weather conditions, the new regulations. I don’t think everyone got it perfect on the day. The car’s good. It’s not good enough to win but it’s still a very competitive car and I think we can show here how good it is. Q: Heinz-Harald, back at Sauber again. What sort of changes have you noticed in the team in the intervening years? Heinz-Harald FRENTZEN: Yeah, in the past years Sauber has grown up as well. The team has become bigger and more professional. They’ve made a lot of improvements in many areas. Q: Where do you see them still having to make improvements in your experience? H-HF: I think, as you know, the car is technically in very good shape. We didn’t have many reliability problems in winter testing and the car ran from the first day to the last without any problems. At the moment, we are using the old wind tunnel and to improve the car, we need to develop the aerodynamic side and the new wind tunnel is in the pipeline. It’s nearly finished, and by the end of this year it will be finished. That’s the dot that’s missing. I think it’s a team of the future. Q: Sauber always seem to get points early in the season but they tend to dry up a bit later. How can that be cured? H-HF: It was a main issue last year as well. I came into the team in Indianapolis and I was right in the middle of the discussions about these problems. The new car, the C22, is designed to be developed at both ends (of the season) in different directions and it is our main focus this year, to make progress from each race onwards. Of course, a more modern wind tunnel will help the situation a bit more. Q: Jarno, was the Melbourne result indicative of the type of performance you would expect? Jarno TRULLI: More or less, yes. We were already pleased to finish the race with both cars. It was a tough weekend, different for everybody because of the new format of the race. But I think we managed the whole weekend very well, so we were pleased to score points with both cars, especially at the start of the season even if we were behind two McLarens, two Ferraris, two Williams which are currently very strong, but we proved that we are getting there and Renault has done a great job over the winter time. Also, I feel that all the structure around got better and better compared to last year’s performance because car has improved a lot. So I think more or less I’m very happy. Q: Now, it’s generally acknowledged that perhaps you don’t have as much power as others. Can the new aerodynamic package make the difference here? JT: Let’s wait and see, we don’t know. Anyway, it’s very hot here so there might be some engines which might be affected by this heat. We’ll see. It will be very important to have good reliability and finish this race first of all. But I think the car’s aerodynamics are very good. The engine has already been improved since the last race so the team is working very very well. I’m really happy about the work they are doing. The last two seasons, they have always improved and that’s the best way to work in a team. Q: Juan Pablo, a good result in Melbourne and here last year for the team. What chances again? Juan Pablo MONTOYA: It’s very difficult to say what’s going to happen. It’s very early. I believe we’ve got a good car for here. Last year we were very strong. I think the conditions are going to help the tyres quite a lot and hopefully that will play into our hands. I think McLaren will be quite strong as well. We’ll see where we are. Q:
What about the HANS device? You have been complaining about being
uncomfortable. How was it in the race in Melbourne?JPM: I was complaining last year when we were trying it. They kind of figured out that the problem with the HANS was with the car so they modified the back of the new chassis so I fitted comfortably and to be honest with you, I didn’t even feel it. I did the first two tests in the 25 with the HANS and then I went back to last year’s car, the 24, without HANS and it felt quite weird actually, driving without it. Q: So are you a believer in HANS then? JPM: No, I’m a believer. I just get on with it. No, it’s good. I thought it was going to be really hard. I know Rubens has struggled quite a bit with it. I’m pretty happy with it. Q: In terms of the heat, Rubens felt this race was the hardest of the year. Is that your feeling? JPM: It’s one of the hardest, especially because you sweat a lot. I think Brazil’s pretty tough as well. It’s not so hard physically but because the straight is a long corner, you just hold the steering wheel with a little pressure all the way round it’s pretty hard, but this one is probably the hardest because of the temperature. Q: Do you have a drinks bottle throughout the race? JPM: Yeah, but a lot of times you don’t even use it. It’s there but I’ll probably have to use it here. Q: Rubens, you talked about the HANS device this morning, but also about your back problems. How much do you think they are related? Rubens BARRICHELLO: They could be, it’s really difficult to see. I have a problem in the lower back which is as far away from the neck but in a way, when I was driving, I had to accommodate myself inside the car because it was hurting, so you try to lower your shoulders and so on. It’s really a pain, it’s not nice. But on Friday and Saturday, I had no problems whatsoever. It was fantastic in there. Of course, I would chose not to run it (HANS) if I could because I feel that I can drive better because I feel I can move better inside the car. But come Sunday, the start of the race, and I’m on the grid and something was happening and all of a sudden, I lost the air (out of the air bag). I thought that the carbon fibre was really hitting the collarbone so I don’t know how I would have finished the race. As I said this morning, I’m aware that it’s something we should use because it’s safer but until someone is happy with it, I figure you shouldn’t oblige someone to run with something that is so uncomfortable. So I hope that my problems have been finished, because there is another time for me to test it, so hopefully it’s going to be fine, but until then, I really wouldn’t use something that is hurting. I wouldn’t oblige someone to use it. Q: We’ll do a quick poll; who would prefer not to run with the HANS device? JV: I would prefer not to. JB: Same. H-HF: Well, due to the development, it needs some more work for it to be comfortable. JT: It’s difficult to say. Without it it’s slightly better but apparently there are strong gains in safety, but I don’t know how much. JPM: I’m happy. Surprising. Q: Rubens, back to you. You mentioned this morning that the team has probably made a lot of changes in terms of strategy since the last race. Can you give some idea of the sort of changes that will have been made? RB: I haven’t been too specific about it. It’s something that I think everyone learned from the first race, but what I was saying was that, as I heard in Brazil, nobody knows if the (Melbourne) race was good because of the new rules or because of the safety car coming out twice and the rain. We have to learn from it. Obviously it was the first race, the first experience, but I don’t know actually if the race was good for one reason or another.
JPM: I think it was the safety car, not the new rules, to be honest. |
|
![]() |
