FOTA Outline Their Formula One Roadmap


By ian Lockwood
March 5 2009

The Formula One Teams Association (FOTA) today outlined its roadmap for Formula One at a press conference at which senior management figures from all 10 current Formula One teams shared the stage together.

Setting out its proposed agenda for the evolution of the sport, FOTA unveiled a dynamic package of unanimously agreed proposals which, pending the approval of the FIA, will take effect in 2009 and/or 2010.

These proposals are aimed at increasing the stability, sustainability, substance and show of Formula One, and have all been developed as a result of rigorous interrogation of a FOTA global audience survey carried out in 17 countries earlier this year. The study canvassed views of existing fans but also, for the first time, drew on insights from a cross-section of general and infrequent followers of the sport, in line with FOTA's stated ambition to broaden as well as to deepen the appeal of Formula One.

The proposals can be classified under three headings - technical, sporting and commercial - in line with the three working groups inaugurated when FOTA was formed in September 2008. These proposals will ensure the retention of Formula One's unique and essential sporting ‘DNA', improve the show for all audiences, reduce costs, and increase the value proposition to the major stakeholders.

Luca di Montezemolo, Chairman of FOTA, said: "This is an unprecedented moment in Formula One history. Above all else, for the first time the teams are unified and steadfast - with a clear,
collective vision. Thanks to this unity, all the teams have already managed to make a significant reduction to their costs for 2009. And, while we will continue to compete vigorously on track, we all share one common goal: to work together to improve Formula One by ensuring its stability, sustainability, substance and show for the benefit of our most important stakeholder, namely the consumer. It is with this mindset that we now intend to work hard, with our partners at the FIA and FOM, our shared goal being to optimise the future of Formula One."

KEY PROPOSALS
Technical
2009:

  • More than 100% increase in mileage per engine (eight engines per driver per season)
  • Reduction in wind tunnel and CFD (computational fluid dynamics) usage
  • Engine available at €8 million per team per season

2010:

  • Engine available at €5 million per team per season
  • Gearbox available at €1.5 million per team per season
  • Standardised KERS (put out to tender, with a target price of €1-2 million per team per season)
  • Target a further 50% reduction of the 2009 aerodynamic development spend
  • Specified number of chassis, bodywork and aerodynamic development iterations (homologations) during the season
  • Prohibition of a wide range of exotic, metallic and composite materials
  • Standardised telemetry and radio systems

Sporting
2009:

  • Testing reduction (50%)
  • New points-scoring system (12-9-7-5-4-3-2-1), to give greater differentiation/reward to grand prix winners
  • Race starting fuel loads, tyre specifications and refuelling data to be made public

2010:

  • Commitment to recommend new qualifying format
  • Radical new points-scoring opportunities (eg, one constructors' championship point to be awarded for the fastest race pit stop)
  • Further testing reductions (four four-day single-car pre-season tests plus one single-car pre-season shakedown)
  • Reduction of grand prix duration (250km or a maximum of one hour 40 minutes) pending the approval of the commercial rights holder

Commercial
2009:

  • Increased data provision for media
  • Explore means by which the presentation of Formula One action can be more informatively and dynamically presented, common to other sports such as tennis and cricket, to dramatically improve engagement with the public
  • Nominated senior team spokesman available for TV during grand prix
  • Commitment to enhance consumer experience via team and FOTA websites
  • Mandatory driver autograph sessions during grand prix weekends

2010:

  • Commitment to enhance consumer experience via TV coverage

KEY DEMOGRAPHICS OF GLOBAL AUDIENCE SURVEY

17 countries surveyed

  • First ever poll of Formula One devotees alongside non-Formula One devotees (ie, marginal and/or low interest fans)
  • Responses were weighted according to the size of viewing market in each country (to avoid small markets skewing the results)
  • Results were segmented by interest level in Formula One, demographic profiles (age and gender), country and region

Total audience is comprised of:

  • Regular fans (25% by volume, predominantly male, cross section of ages)
  • Moderate fans (44% by volume, female and male, cross section of ages)
  • Infrequent fans (31% by volume, unlikely to watch grands prix, predominantly female, cross section of ages)


KEY FINDINGS OF GLOBAL AUDIENCE SURVEY

1. F1 isn't broken, so beware ‘over-fixing' it.

The current race format is not viewed as fundamentally broken (across all levels of Formula One interest) and therefore doesn't require radical alteration. There is a strong desire for Formula One to remain meritocratic, while consumer interest is driven most by appreciation of driver skill, overtaking and technology.

Implication: there is no evidence to suggest that grand prix formats need ‘tricking up' via, for example, handicapping, sprint races, reversed grids or one-on-one pursuit races. Formula One audiences appreciate the traditional gladiatorial, high-tech nature of the sport and would not respond favourably to a perceived ‘dumbing down' of the current format.

2. F1 needs to be more consumer-friendly.

An individual's view or understanding of Formula One is framed almost entirely by their local broadcaster. Unlike most global sports, the vast majority of ‘consumption' of Formula One is via race-day TV coverage, supplemented in part by traditional, non-specialist newspaper coverage. Formula One fans are also mature consumers of new media channels (eg, on-line, mobile) and other touch points (eg, gaming, merchandise). The global nature of Formula One, although an attractive characteristic in itself, impedes the uniformity of race schedules, and often results in consumption of a race being limited to locally broadcast TV highlights programmes. Only devotees (25% of the total potential viewing audience) are likely to watch a race live if it occurs outside peak viewing times.

Implication: significant opportunities exist to build audience via other channels such as internet and mobile.

3. Major changes to qualifying format are not urgent.

When asked to consider alternative qualifying formats, all fan types expressed a modest preference for a meritocratically determined starting grid. There was some degree of interest in allowing luck to play a part in shaping the starting order, but the general sentiment was that the
fastest driver should always start from pole.

Implication: there may be justification for minor modifications to the current qualifying format, following further trials; however, a major change to the format will not result in a significant increase in audience.

4. Revisions to the points-scoring system

As with qualifying, all audiences want a meritocratic points-scoring system. This means that they want winning grands prix to count for more than it does currently. There is an indication that all audiences would like to see a greater points reward for winning grands prix.

Implication: a minor adjustment to the existing points system is justified

5. Evolution of pit stops and refuelling

All audiences view pit stops as integral to their enjoyment of grand prix coverage; however, they rank the most important and compelling aspect of pit stops as tyre changing rather than
refuelling. Race strategies were not highly ranked as a determinant of interest in Formula One.

Implication: audiences are unlikely to diminish if refuelling is discontinued. Tyre changing is an important driver of audience interest (in pit stops) and should not be further automated.

TEAM PRINCIPAL QUOTES

Sir Frank Williams (Team Principal, AT&T WilliamsF1)
"The new FOTA group has the best of intentions in representing the teams' best interests, both technically and commercially. FOTA wishes to enjoy an open and productive relationship with both the FIA and FOM."

Dr Mario Theissen (BMW Motorsport Director and Team Principal, BMW Sauber F1 Team)

"The FIA and FOTA are pursuing the same aims - to increase the sporting value of Formula One and to cut the expenditure required to do so. Reducing costs is definitely the way to go. The members of FOTA have made great efforts to this end over recent months and have set out a whole series of measures which will already allow substantial cost savings in 2009. Further savings for the coming years will follow in due course."


Dr Vijay Mallya (Chairman and Team Principal, Force India Formula One Team)

"Formula One is undoubtedly about competition and striving to beat one's opposition. While this is very much the essence of the on-track action, unity and collaboration off-track is crucial. The
open spirit of discussion and co-operation to increase both the spectacle and financial viability of Formula One are entirely positive for the sport and its investors - ie, the teams, the sponsors and of course the fans. I fully support the initiatives and hope that between FOTA, the FIA and FOM we can find a balance to safeguard the wonderful sport we have before us now."


Flavio Briatore (Team Principal, ING Renault F1 Team)

"Through FOTA we have found unity among the teams as we strive to provide a sustainable future for Formula One. From a commercial standpoint, we recognise that while our sport enjoysa remarkable global reach, there is still room to improve its appeal as an investment opportunity. It is clear that we need to strengthen Formula One as a show and through our global audience survey we have given a voice to the consumers of Formula One. The results confirm that we must exploit the potential of new media, while continuing to enhance the TV experience, which remains the most important interface with the public. It is therefore essential to provide our audience with more information and to make the teams and drivers more accessible to ensure that we deliver a product that is always exciting, unpredictable and compelling both on and off the track. I am confident that, working together, and in a constructive spirit with both governing bodies FIA and FOM, FOTA can help build a solid future for the sport in the years ahead."

Tadashi Yamashina (Team Principal, Panasonic Toyota F1)

"FOTA has already achieved a great deal and we can be very satisfied with the progress we have made, but there is a lot of work still ahead of us. It is vitally important not to neglect the
soul of grand prix racing. Formula One is the pinnacle of motorsport and our challenge is to retain the DNA of the sport as a technological as well as a human contest, while also delivering
value for money for all stakeholders, and this includes the fans. We all embrace the need to cut costs, and the significant savings achieved by FOTA and the FIA at the end of last year are a
promising start. FOTA's strength lies in the unity of the teams. This unprecedented joint initiative, which we hope will work in combination with the FIA and FOM, can inspire Formula One to conquer the challenges facing it and the wider world."

Christian Horner (Team Principal, Red Bull Racing)

"Since FOTA was established in the summer of 2008, the organisation has already made strides, in conjunction with the FIA, towards achieving significant cost savings for the 2009 season. Through FOTA's working groups, the teams are acting as a unit for the first time to ensure Formula One improves its appeal to all generations of fans, while continuing to control costs. Red Bull fully supports the work of FOTA."

Stefano Domenicali (Team Principal, Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro)

"United in our intentions and with a common vision for the future of Formula One, while remaining rivals on track: these are the key strengths of FOTA. It is thanks to its creation that we have already achieved significant results in just a few months. Racing is part of Ferrari's DNA and will always be so, which is why we are working very hard, along with all the other teams. We must continue on this track to make our sport more exciting for the fans and more attractive for our current partners and also potential ones, while maintaining close links with the production of road cars."

Franz Tost (Team Principal, Scuderia Toro Rosso)

"FOTA has already achieved a great deal in a short space of time, thanks to unprecedented unanimity amongst the teams. The motto ‘united we stand, divided we fall' has been around for many years, but Formula One team owners took a while to take it on board! FOTA should not rest on its laurels, but continue to collaborate as closely as possible with the FIA and FOM to ensure the continued success of Formula One as a sport, as entertainment and as a business."

Martin Whitmarsh (Team Principal, Vodafone McLaren Mercedes)

"FOTA has already achieved more than any other assembly of Formula One teams in the history of our sport, and those achievements are both a result of and a testament to the strength
of FOTA's unity. On track, Formula One teams remain as competitive as ever; but, off track, in collaboration with the FIA and FOM, motivated by our shared ambition to steer grand prix racing to ever-greater successes, we're now devoting a great deal of time, resource and radical thought to making a concerted effort to enhance the benefits of all Formula One stakeholders - the teams, the manufacturers, the sponsors, the media and above all the fans."

Ross Brawn

"FOTA represents a hugely important initiative, all of the Formula One teams working together to combine their strengths to the benefit of all aspects of our sport, Formula One. Never before
have I experienced the level of unity and commitment of the teams that has been demonstrated within FOTA under the leadership of Luca di Montezemolo. This is a complementary process to the work of the FIA and FOM and enables the teams to present unified views on how we can take both our sport and the motorsport industry forward. As an ex-rugby player, I was taught to apply the principles of competition on the field and a spirit of co-operation and unity off the field. That is the principle of FOTA."

Bookmark or share this story with:

FOTA Outline Their Formula One Roadmap
Discussion started by Racing Bulls , 05/03/2009 12:56
Racing Bulls
05/03/2009 12:56
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

Jock 2009
05/03/2009 13:22
Evolution or revolution. Some pretty radical stuff in there if you think about it. Only three things I disagree with.

1. Reduction of grand prix duration (250km or a maximum of one hour 40 minutes) pending the approval of the commercial rights holder.

I like the race lengths now. I don't see a need to reduce them and I think this is only tabled to support point three.

2. Mandatory driver autograph sessions during grand prix weekends.

Neither Stirling Moss or Jack Brabham needed to be TOLD to sign my autograph book. Great men just do it gladly.

3.All audiences view pit stops as integral to their enjoyment of grand prix coverage; however, they rank the most important and compelling aspect of pit stops as tyre changing rather than refuelling. Race strategies were not highly ranked as a determinant of interest in Formula One.


This is the most disturbing I feel. I love the pit stop strategy and the complexity of the two components of fuel and tyres both needing to be managed. Did he run light, was he fast in Q3 with a full load, will he go for the soft compound and a heavy fuel load....the possibilities are endless and with the suggestion of allowing the fuel load data to be publicised it would be even better. DON'T DO IT!

http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii244/jock298/Untitled-1.jpg

...on Earth, as it is in Queensland

growler
05/03/2009 13:39
I'd be happy with the proposed points system.

I think qualifying works as it is and doesn't need changing.

Don't want the races any shorter - I'm paying £250 a ticket - I want my moneys worth! Don't see the point of this from the teams either - sureley it will just reduce sponsors exposure??

Points for the fastest pit-stop is madness! The pit crews are going as fast as they can anyway. Giving points for this could lead to more shortcuts being made creating more danger - and teams spending multi-millions on "super fast wheel nuts / guns", that add nothing to the show.

www.racingbulls.net
http://www.sig-generator.com/banner-maker/banners/4030361613236369s.jpg

Jock 2009
05/03/2009 13:42
What about points for pole, fastest lap, hottest grid girls etc...

http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii244/jock298/Untitled-1.jpg

...on Earth, as it is in Queensland

LoudHoward
05/03/2009 13:59
Reduction of grand prix duration (250km or a maximum of one hour 40 minutes) pending the approval of the commercial rights holder

BOO-URNS!

http://www.users.on.net/~loud_howard/webber/sigs/webbersiglatest4.jpg
http://www.patronisef1.com - My solution to F1's 'bore' problem.

RedWebber07
05/03/2009 14:45
not thrilled with shorter race distances, like Ian says I want value for money thanks.

I'd prefer qualifying went back to the way it was in 2005 - single outlap, hotlap, and inlap with the running order based on your P3 times. 2 stage qualifying, I liked that.

Channel 10 aint about to spend any money making the show better for Australia anyway, we're stuck in the dark ages when races aren't even live in many areas.

http://www.gb64.com/Screenshots/L/Last_Ninja_III.png

________________________
Mark Webber - WINNER 2009 German Grand Prix!

RuralVic
05/03/2009 16:23
I agree with what's been said.
1hr 40mins is too short.
Refuelling is good.
Fastest pit stop is silly.
So is mandatory autograph sessions
If there's a need to add to points then for pole, fastest lap. (Not sure about for hottest grid girl unless I get to interview them all)
Disclosing fuel loads takes away excitement - is a driver fastest or light-fuelled??? Now we'll know the answers instead of seeing how the race develops.

Keppel
05/03/2009 21:44
Points for fastest pit stop really is madness! What's to stop a Force India from taking a pit stop for one lap of fuel on the penultimate lap and getting the point smiling smiley

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/7851/sig2009.png

RuralVic
05/03/2009 22:26
Quote:
Keppel
Points for fastest pit stop really is madness! What's to stop a Force India from taking a pit stop for one lap of fuel on the penultimate lap and getting the point smiling smiley
Because pitstops will be tyres only, no refuelling

Though if Force India get to the penultimate lap, that'll be an improvement!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:03:05:22:27:41 by RuralVic.

SydneyF1Fan
06/03/2009 02:50
I don't mind the shorter race time. Let's face it, the race result is mainly determined by half-time and the second half is often a bit of a procession, barring mechanical failure or other surprises, which could happen at any time. Also, I could get to bed earlier and wake up with a smaller hangover. Kimi could probably do with the extra sleep too!

New point score good. (Nearly as good as Bernie's medal suggestion - ducks for cover!!)

I can understand the "constructors" point for fastest pit stop adds motivation and interest to the team performance, particularly the pit crew. I don't think it will really add to the danger - it's not like the pit crew is going deliberately slow at the moment. My only concern is whether there are ways to circumvent the rules to get the fastest pit stop time. Obviously refuelling would not be a factor. However, presumably the pit stop would have to be for all 4 tyres? What if they if they only changed one tyre, or Force India came in to wipe the driver's visor?

Also, how would they precisely time the pit stop? The most accurate and fair method would probably be the time taken from start to end of pit lane, but this would be subject to potential pit lane speeding abuse. If it is the "stand still" time, would be difficult to measure. If the timing system was "in car" then presumably would need some sort of driver activation? If it was external to the car then hard to see how they could accurately and realiably measure the stop/start time without it being open to some sort of abuse.

Totally agree with points for grid girls. I guess we should allow grid boys for Ali and Caz's sake too?!!

By mandatory driver autographs, I presume they intend to set up a stand where fans can line up in an orderly fashion and get autographs from the drivers at a set time, as opposed to a driver being "forced" to sign when a fan randomly hands them a pen and paper as they're walking back to the pits. Again, I think this would be a good move - trying to give the fans an opportunity to directly connect with the drivers, something that is a bit lacking at the moment. I don't think they're implying that the drivers aren't "gentlemen" anymore (even though that may well be the case with some).

Increased data provision to the media and access to team spokesman during the race are excellent moves. As a tennis and cricket fan too, the additional data and graphics (hawk-eye etc) really add to the enjoyment of the sport. And inside info from the team always gives you a much better perspective on the race tactics than the TV commentary crew.

Would prefer to see a bigger commitment on increasing content and data on the web rather than TV (some by FOTA and teams in 2009). Obviously Bernie wants to protect the value of his TV rights, but I'd prefer to have a bit more control over the data and stats I see rather than relying on TV coverage.

Standard KERS - one year too late, but otherwise a good move! If only I got a 10% share of the wasted R&D spend for making this suggestion!!!

Not a fan of reducing testing further. What are we all going to do in the off season??? I can understand it has a direct impact on reducing costs, but it has to have an effect on increased unreliability and, perhaps, performance differential between the haves and have-nots. It's also a shame new drivers are not getting the exposure they need.

Overall, I think a positive direction.

growler
06/03/2009 08:52
Problem with shortening the races is that mechanical failures and driver errors are more likley to occur as the equipment and driver become tired - i.e. towads the end of a long race - this would be less likely in a shorter race. I think you'd still get that "flat" period towards the end of a race - after the final pit stop - it would just come sooner.

Maybe the point for fastest pitstop could work if they only apply it to the constructors championship rather than the drivers championship. It would have to be for a 4 tyre change stop, and if the driver fell foul of the pitlane speed limit the point wouldn't count. That way teams are rewarded for their efficiency, but you couldn't have a driver losing the championship by a couple of points because a rival had a faster pit-crew.

www.racingbulls.net
http://www.sig-generator.com/banner-maker/banners/4030361613236369s.jpg

LoudHoward
06/03/2009 09:05
Bleh, you may as well give a point for the most efficient rear wing.

I don't know, maybe it's just me, but they already give points for the fastest pit crew, when Ferrari get Kimi out just ahead of someone in a pitstop, they get more constructors points at the end of the race. Seems like a real lame way to try and "spice" things up.

I probably care about the WCC more than most people, and I don't really care that much at all about it. They've lost touch if they think I'm going to get some sort of happiness out of some team getting a point for a pitstop.

It's a Grand Prix. They should be longer, and everything that happens from designing, testing, practicing, qualifying, pitstopping; everything should be down to getting the result at the end of the (not 15 laps shorter) GP.

It's a challenge to get everything together and thats how I want it to stay, if your team is only good at pitstops or you can only design a car thats good over a single lap but absolute trash everywhere else, you don't deserve any points.

http://www.users.on.net/~loud_howard/webber/sigs/webbersiglatest4.jpg
http://www.patronisef1.com - My solution to F1's 'bore' problem.

Duffer
06/03/2009 10:53
Points for the fastest pit crew? WTF? What a hoax. Is it April 1?

K1
06/03/2009 10:57
these people are supposed to be 'top of the tree' when it comes to F1 and yet they are proposing some of the dumbest ideas i have ever seen. points for fastest pit stop is pathetic! i would support a point for fastest lap, and a point for pole but that's about it.
as for shorter races well that is also a dumb suggestion. why on earth would they want to do that? is it a TV gambit? can't really be linked to costs surely, and as for the autograph bizzo well all i can say is, extremely lame. all the other points seem reasonable at first reading.

...trollie
07/03/2009 03:31
Webber has commented before about shorter GP's in a positive way. I don't agree. Sometimes I think they should be longer to put more strategy of attrition into the event.

I think the TV improvement will be great if they can mimic other sporting events like cricket and tennis.

Your Name: 
Subject: 
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net