What If Medals Had Always Been in F1?


By Ian Lockwood
January 30 2009

Further to the proposal for medals to replace points in the FIA Formula One World Championship, the FIA has conducted an analysis of how the proposed system would have altered the results of previous seasons. Under the medals system, it is proposed that the top three drivers in each race would win gold, silver and bronze medals. At the end of the season the driver with the most gold medals would win the championship. If two or more drivers have the same number of golds then the silver medals would come into account and so on.

The FIA’s analysis shows that the medal system would change the outcomes of past World Championships considerably. Only 22 of the 59 World Championships to date would have the same top 3. The other 37 World Championships would be different.
The World Champion would be altered on 13 occasions.

The medal system would create three “new” World Champions who did not win the title using the various points systems.

The overall effect would be to reduce the number of World Champions, concentrating the titles in a smaller group.

The results that would change are largely before 1990. The last 20 years would be largely unchanged.

In the overall assessment the list of World Championships per driver would be altered as follows:


 

 1958 Stirling Moss    instead of Mike Hawthorn
 1964 Jim Clark   instead of John Surtees
 1967 Jim Clark   instead of Denny Hulme
 1977 Mario Andretti    instead of Niki Lauda
 1979 Alan Jones     instead of Jody Scheckter
 1981 Alain Prost    instead of Nelson Piquet
 1982 Didier Pironi   instead of Keke Rosberg
 1983 Alain Prost       instead of Nelson Piquet
 1984 Alain Prost      instead of Niki Lauda
 1986 Nigel Mansell    instead of Alain Prost
 1987 Nigel Mansell  instead of Nelson Piquet
 1989 Ayrton Senna    instead of Alain Prost
 2008 Felipe Massa      instead of Lewis Hamilton


 

Michael Schumacher 7 1994 1995 200020012002 2003 2004 
Juan Manuel Fangio 1951 1954 1955 1956 1957  
Alain Prost 5 19811983 1984 1985 1993   
Jim Clark 41963196419651967   
Ayrton Senna  41988198919901991   
Jack Brabham    3195919601966    
Jackie Stewart     3196919711973    
Nigel Mansell   3198619871992    


 

Instead of the existing totals:

Michael Schumacher    719941995 2000  2001 200220032004 
Juan Manuel Fangio    51951 1954 1955 1956 1957  
Alain Prost   41985 19861989 1993    
Jack Brabham    31959 19601966    
Jackie Stewart    31969 1971 1973     
Niki Lauda  31975 19771984     
Nelson Piquet  319811983 1987     
Ayrton Senna      3198819901991    


 

Key notional changes to be noted:

Brabham under the ownership of Bernie Ecclestone would have won no Drivers’ Championships.

Stirling Moss would have been the first British World Champion.

Jim Clark would have won four titles, rather than two. He would have won three consecutive  titles in 1963-64-65.

Mario Andretti and Alan Jones would each have won two titles instead of one.

Niki Lauda would have lost two of his three championships and would have just one title to his name.

It should be noted, however, that the 1977 result is skewed by the fact that Lauda left Ferrari as soon as he had won the title and did not compete in the final races. If the scoring system had been different the result would almost certainly not have favoured Andretti.

Nelson Piquet would have lost all three of his World Championships.

All four World Champions between 1981-1984 would have been different.

Alain Prost would have won five World Championships but they would be different to the four that he actually claimed. His titles were won in 1985, 1986, 1989 and 1993. With the medal system they would have been 1981, 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1993. He would have won three consecutive titles in 1983-85.

Nigel Mansell would have won three World Championships instead of one, adding to 1986 and 1987 to his 1992 triumph.

Ayrton Senna would have won the 1989 title and thus would have had four consecutive titles between 1988 and 1991.

The duration of the World Championship battles

The duration of the World Championship battle would have been altered in 22 of the 59 seasons. The medal system would have had no effect in 37 of the 59 World Championships.

Fourteen World Championship battles would have been shorter (1955, 1970, 1978, 1987, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2003 and 2004).

Eight World Championship battles would have lasted longer (1973, 1977, 1979, 1980, 1990, 1991, 2001 and 2005).

In terms of World Championship final race showdowns, there would have been five lost (1955, 1994, 1996, 1997, 2000) but six gained (1977, 1979, 1980, 1990, 1991 and 2005).

source: FIA Press Release

Bookmark or share this story with:

What If Medals Had Always Been in F1?
Discussion started by Racing Bulls , 30/01/2009 11:14
Racing Bulls
30/01/2009 11:14
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

Jock 2009
30/01/2009 11:25
Lets do it. And make it retrospective to '58 to give the greatest race car driver never to win the WDC his due.

http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii244/jock298/Untitled-1.jpg

...on Earth, as it is in Queensland

SydneyF1Fan
30/01/2009 12:34
I reckon those outcomes are much better!

Agree with Stirling Moss and Nige getting 3 WDC's is surely just reward for the Lion-heart! Jim Clark's 4 WDC's would have reflected his true champ pedigree too.

Exposes the Piquet's as pretenders.

Goes to prove what a genuine champ Schui was.

But Massa denying Lewis has to be the greatest argument yet!

gturner
31/01/2009 01:32
Of course, if you do make it retroactive, then Stirling Moss's greatest claim to fame kind of becomes a moot point. I mean the "Greatest Driver to Never Win a World Championship" is more significant than "The Greatest Driver to Win One World Championship."

LoudHoward
31/01/2009 02:13
Exactly. Good luck trying to retroactively take Mike Hawthorns championship away from him that prompted him to retire and then well...die.

It's a silly idea, and when Bernie said a few weeks ago "it doesn't need to be medals, just something changed" (paraphrasing) then we knew it was a dead idea. Maybe the points for a win will bump up to 12 but thats it I think.

http://www.users.on.net/~loud_howard/webber/sigs/webbersiglatest4.jpg
http://www.patronisef1.com - My solution to F1's 'bore' problem.

...trollie
31/01/2009 05:33
Are you bored FIA?

growler
31/01/2009 09:44
Think they must have had someone on on work experience and thought "We'd better find him something to do"

www.racingbulls.net
http://www.sig-generator.com/banner-maker/banners/4030361613236369s.jpg

bigsmith
31/01/2009 11:13
Mike Hawthorn's retirement was prompted more by his failing health than the fact he had beaten Moss to the '58 title. He had an incurable kidney problem (in those days before dialysis and transplants were commonplace) and had also started to suffer blackouts. Indeed it is a matter for conjecture that a blackout could have been a cause of his fatal car crash.

For more information on all things Mike Hawthorn I would strongly recommend the Tribute site at [www.mike-hawthorn.org.uk] a real labour of love.

Your Name: 
Subject: 
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net