Force India Intend To Continue Partying


By Alianora La Canta
December 24 2008

Over the past few weeks, we've seen many signs that the global recession is biting cash-intensive F1. Honda have withdrawn, Toyota are going into austerity measures and the FIA and FOTA have agreed a number of measures intended to cut costs. Strangely but happily, it appears that Force India are not plagued by the same worries.

While other teams have been complaining about having to cut costs due to the global recession, Force India has issued a press release saying that it intends to continue the lavish parties it held in 2008 into the future. It is an interesting statement because it shows that Vijay Mallya is not worried that the economy will affect his ability to run the F1 team. Red Bull are demonstrating that when the economy contracts, it is the publicity and marketing projects that gets toned down or binned first. (Unless you're Honda, then you bin the B-team first, followed by the entire project).

 

Hopefully this will not distract Force India from improving on the track. However, Jordan showed that it was possible to perform and party at the same time and it would be good to think that was still possible a decade later.

Bookmark or share this story with:

Force India Intend To Continue Partying
Discussion started by Force India (IP Logged), 24/12/2008 23:26
Force India
Force India
24/12/2008 23:26
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.

MESSAGES->author
Sunset-Taker
25/12/2008 00:11
Force India is NOT Jordan - we are way better than Crappy Norton back in Ninety-Ninteen-Nine.

soluto_de_lugol
soluto_de_lugol
25/12/2008 20:33
Oh really? Can you remind me again of how many wins do we have in the bag?




...yes, that's right.

:|

Alianora La Canta
Alianora La Canta
25/12/2008 21:15
Sunset, Force India is the latest incarnation of the team that began as Jordan. There is nothing wrong with Force India taking the best bits from its predecessors and adding its own improvements.

MESSAGES->author
Sunset-Taker
26/12/2008 12:15
Quote:
soluto_de_lugol
Oh really? Can you remind me again of how many wins do we have in the bag?



...yes, that's right.

:|

with such an attitude you should leave the forum.

WE ARE FORCE INDIA - AND NOTHING ELSE!

Alianora La Canta
Alianora La Canta
27/12/2008 21:02
Sunset-Taker, please could you be more respectful of other members of the forum? Simply because you and soluto do not agree with each other does not mean either of you should leave the forum, or indeed that you cannot co-exist with one another here.

soluto_de_lugol
soluto_de_lugol
27/12/2008 21:14
ahhh... leave it. I'm getting used to this sort of treatment and it didn't deserve a reply. He makes killing threads a sport.

Anyway, I'm off on hollidays for a few days to a place where there is no internet. Happy new year, folks!


Cheers,
SdL

Speky
Speky
28/12/2008 10:57
Unfortunately Sunset, just because there is a new name on the gate doesn't mean that the team should no longer be supported by the fans that have been around a lot longer than you have. The new sign on the door doesn't make any difference to the fact the team is based in England and employs probably 90% + British staff. Pretty much all of the staff stay the same whoever has their name above the door.

I have been a fan of this team from way back when Frentzen and Hill were driving, I continue to support them now. They may have an Indian flavour now but they are still pretty much the same team that they were when they were Jordan, Midland and Spyker. I'm sure the team appreciates all the support it can get whether it be from long term fans that have always supported the team, and also from new fans. I would hazard a guess that if VJ were to sell the team at some stage, it is unlikely that you (Sunset) would support the team any more, whereas us long term supporters still would. Which of those is the best type of fan from a teams point of view? Long term fan or fly by night!

Apologies for the rant...

Alianora La Canta
Alianora La Canta
28/12/2008 23:14
Happy New Year, soluto!

Speky, your rant is understood.

I remember there was one time when I thought that if Eddie Jordan left Jordan that I would no longer support it, for how could Jordan ever be the same without him? Then he left and I realised that the things I liked about the team were not just in him (though he was a clear embodiment of those things) but in the whole workforce, in the whole way the team operated. Switching ownership did not destroy its virtues. Mostly the owner changes altered the context through which they were expressed. Some of the virtues of the new bosses were also picked up by the team - for example it is no coincidence that Jordan became a lot more efficient in how it dealt with garage-side activities under Midland, or that it extended its online media reach under Spyker. As the team has gone through its various phases, picking up different things from the subsequent owners, so it has evolved into the team we see today. And so I came to understand the team more and shed some of the conditionalities my support had previously carried.

The journey to new fan via conditional fan to unconditional fan is a process that cannot be forced (and sometimes goes into reverse when a team behaves contrary to fan expectations), but it does explain why it is possible to get such different views on a subject that bridges different phases of the team like this one.

Your Name: 
Subject: 
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net